|
||||
|
Golf has been accused of many things over the years. The game is too hard. It’s too expensive. It takes too long. Well, after 30 years of careful consideration, I’m going to hang another complaint on it: It’s unfair. You read that right. I said unfair. The game is beholden to an archaic set of rules established back in the days when women couldn’t vote, let alone play golf. They were forged back in a time when innovation meant switching from wooden shafts to aluminum and balls were stuffed with feathers. It was an elitist game used as a form of social status, and no one cared if it was too difficult, time-consuming or costly for the masses. Flash forward to the 21st century, and golf has an identity crisis. It’s still perceived to be too hard and, in this fast-paced world, it pokes along like a dial-up Internet connection. Oh, how I’d love to give the game a makeover. I’ll start by saying that I wouldn’t touch tournament rules. Less than 1 percent of the world’s golfers play competitively at the professional and elite amateur level. Keep your rule book, climb off your soapbox and take a breath. Golf history as we know it can continue. What I’m proposing is an entirely different set of rules for the 99.5 percent of “real” golfers. My rule changes would allow a more casual approach to the round without all the shame and guilt of “not playing by the rules.” The first thing I’d eliminate is the 14-club rule. Who cares how many clubs a player carries? If you and your 28 handicap have more fun carting around three putters, five wedges, two drivers and an assortment of hybrids, fairway woods and irons, whom is that hurting? Next: Declare divots in the fairway as ground under repair. This would allow players to place their balls in a good lie outside the divot, which is exactly what you deserve for driving the ball in the fairway. There is no logic in forcing a player to play a shot they never practice from a torn-up piece of turf created by another player hours or even days earlier. How is that a reward for a perfectly played shot to the desired location? How painful is the walk of shame when you launch a ball off the golf course and you have to skulk back to your bag to get another ball? Why, if you drive the ball 250 yards and your ball ends up three inches out of bounds, do you have to play again from the tee box? My next proposal is that any time a ball leaves the course, whether it flies into a lake, hazard or beyond the course boundary, the player can place the ball at the point nearest to where the ball left the course where the player can make a full swing. It’s that simple. No more wondering if you re-tee, take a drop or how many club lengths you get. There’s a veteran rules official and former tournament director for the PGA of America named Ron O’Connor. He knows the rule book forward and backward, inside and out. He even knows the Decisions book, and I’ll bet most of you didn’t even know there is a Decisions book. During one of our many rounds together, one of our playing partners suggested taking mulligans off the first tee and wanted to know if we were going to take putts that were “inside the leather.” Without missing a beat, Ron grumbled “Are we golfing or are we bowling?” Our playing companion was stunned and said, “We’re golfing.” Ron finished the discussion by saying, “If we aren’t gonna play by the rules, we might as well call what you want to do bowling.” While I appreciate Ron’s dedication to the history and rules of the game, it’s time to think out of the box for the 99.5 percent. If the golf industry wants more people to play and enjoy the game, make it easier. The game needs to adapt or run the risk of losing players to other activities, like bowling.. Greg Flores has been a sports and entertainment publicist for 20 years and has written for Southland Golf since 1995. |
||||
| Comment at 1/12/2012 |
| Comment at 1/12/2012 |
| Comment at 1/14/2012 |
| Comment at 1/22/2012 |
| Comment at 1/25/2012 |
| Comment at 1/25/2012 |